Re: Two Versions of SQL Server 2000, Service Pack 3
From: SQL Server Development Team [MSFT] (sqldev@microsoft.com)
Date: 01/30/03
- Next message: JOSEPH CASTRO: "Re: SQL SP3 on .NET SERVER EVAL WORM"
- Previous message: SQL Server Development Team [MSFT]: "Re: Service pack MSDE problem"
- In reply to: David: "Two Versions of SQL Server 2000, Service Pack 3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "SQL Server Development Team [MSFT]" <sqldev@microsoft.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:00:17 -0800
What does select @@version return you on those servers that you installed
SP3 on late last year? We have only released one version of SP3, and it was
released on January 17th, version 8.00.760. Sounds to me like you've got
beta versions installed on your servers.
-- Sincerely, Stephen Dybing This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Please reply to the newsgroups only, thanks. "David" <david.mcnamee@sc.ngb.army.mil> wrote in message news:050601c2c873$8401a610$89f82ecf@TK2MSFTNGXA01... > MS released SQL Server 2000 Service Pack 3 late last > year. Our boxes were updated and when queried indicated > that they had SQL Server 2000 Service Pack 3 installed. > Many servers were exploited that had that version of > service pack 3 installed. So now the security personnel > are telling our entire enterprise NOT to install service > pack 3, even though I am trying to tell them that the new > version is okay. Well, as of Jan 27 there is a new re- > released version of service pack 3, but since it doesn't > say it is a "new or re-released" version of service pack > 3, the "security experts" are still assuming it is the > vulnerable service pack 3. Where can I find it in an > article or documentation that specifically states that the > current version of service pack 3 that MS has on its > download page, is in fact a re-release of service pack 3. > MS seems to be playing with semantics by saying it is a re- > release of the security patch. The difference between re- > releaseing a security patch with a new Q-number, and re- > releaseing a service pack with the same number is going to > have negative implications and smells like a cover-up.
- Next message: JOSEPH CASTRO: "Re: SQL SP3 on .NET SERVER EVAL WORM"
- Previous message: SQL Server Development Team [MSFT]: "Re: Service pack MSDE problem"
- In reply to: David: "Two Versions of SQL Server 2000, Service Pack 3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|