Re: Secure a SQL-Server 2000 database.
From: Ingar Eide (ingar@eide.gs)
Date: 01/23/03
- Next message: R. van Noorloos: "Re: Security bug?"
- Previous message: Hal Berenson: "Re: Brute Force"
- In reply to: Mary Chipman: "Re: Secure a SQL-Server 2000 database."
- Next in thread: Mary Chipman: "Re: Secure a SQL-Server 2000 database."
- Reply: Mary Chipman: "Re: Secure a SQL-Server 2000 database."
- Reply: Carlos Y. Maldonado, Ph.D.: "Re: Secure a SQL-Server 2000 database."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: ingar@eide.gs (Ingar Eide) Date: 23 Jan 2003 00:04:01 -0800
Mary Chipman <mchip@nomail.please> wrote in message news:<d4au2v4ntkrg0n1pf3nrl9u1v3thsc0lq0@4ax.com>...
> >Yes, if they is an administrator they can do anything. But SQL
> >Anywhere does not have any logins to the server, they log in to the DB
> >instead, and the users/logins are stored in the DB instead of the
> >server.
>
> And what makes you think this is secure? I don't even know SQL
> Anywhere, and I'd be willing to bet almost any amount of money that
> whatever encryption algorithm used on these logins/passwords has
> already been cracked. If an attacker has physical access to a file,
> any file, you have no security at all if that person is sufficiently
> motivated and has the right knowledge/tools.
>
I'm sure everything can be or has been cracked, but I feel that with
SQLServer, there is nothing I can do to protect my data/structure if I
don't have control over the machine. The DB is "complete open".
If the logins were in the DB instead of the SQLserver, there was at
least a chance to protect the DB.
I hope Microsoft will come up with a better solution for us that use
SQLserver for applications who is ment for mass distribution where we
don't have control over the DBserver (machine).
But as you say, if a person has the file and is motivated to crack it
he can do that.
So all in all, I think we have to write something about it in the
license agreement.
-Ingar.
- Next message: R. van Noorloos: "Re: Security bug?"
- Previous message: Hal Berenson: "Re: Brute Force"
- In reply to: Mary Chipman: "Re: Secure a SQL-Server 2000 database."
- Next in thread: Mary Chipman: "Re: Secure a SQL-Server 2000 database."
- Reply: Mary Chipman: "Re: Secure a SQL-Server 2000 database."
- Reply: Carlos Y. Maldonado, Ph.D.: "Re: Secure a SQL-Server 2000 database."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|