Re: Problems with new security patch....

From: Arvind Krishnan[MS] (arvindk@online.microsoft.com)
Date: 10/30/02


From: "Arvind Krishnan[MS]" <arvindk@online.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:12:46 -0800


Johnnie,
Would it be possible for you to work with SQL Server Product Support to see
if we can gather more information about your specific problem and see if it
is indeed related to the new patch? We did not see this problem during our
testing, and so, any help you can provide in helping us resolve this is much
appreciated.

--
Thanks,
Arvind Krishnan
SQL Server Development Team
Microsoft Corporation
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Johnnie Miami" <johnnie_miami@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:egjjIxDfCHA.1760@tkmsftngp12...
> Hi Arvind!
>     After we installed the patch we had problems with queries of this
nature
> It through errors like:
>
> Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server error '80040e14'
>
> SqlDumpExceptionHandler: Process 51 generated fatal exception c0000005
> EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION. SQL Server is terminating this process.
>
> Here is a sample query.  I have changed the fieldnames, tablenames to keep
> things private.
> Select D.EID, D.EName, P.PID, d.TID From (Select E.EID, E.EName, te.TID
From
> MyETable E, MYTETable TE Where TE.EID = E.EID And TE.TID =" &
> Trim(tRs.Fields(0)) & ") D
> Left Outer Join (SELECT * FROM MYPETable WHERE PID = " & projectID & ") P
ON
> D.EID = P.EID AND d.TID = p.TID
>
> Queries like this had been running since May.  Once we broke these queries
> up we did not get the errors.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> "Arvind Krishnan[MS]" <arvindk@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:#MDmUWueCHA.2672@tkmsftngp11...
> > Johnnie,
> > Would it be possible for you to post a script that would help me
reproduce
> > this problem?
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Arvind Krishnan
> > SQL Server Development Team
> > Microsoft Corporation
> > --
> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> > "Johnnie Miami" <johnnie_miami@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:#W5j2udeCHA.2548@tkmsftngp10...
> > > Since apply the new Elevation of Privilege in SQL Server Web Tasks
> > > (Q316333)(Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-061), we have nested
> subqueries
> > > that are no longer working.  These queries are now throwing this
error:
> > >
> > > Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server error '80040e14'
> > >
> > > SqlDumpExceptionHandler: Process 51 generated fatal exception c0000005
> > > EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION. SQL Server is terminating this process.
> > >
> > > Anyone else experience this?
> > >
> > > This is on SQL Server 2000.
> > > - Johnnie
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


Relevant Pages

  • Re: The best elegant solution to override 65k rows limit in a sheet
    ... Access ships with MSDE.. ... >SQL Server Books Online (again-- Access ships with freeware SQL Server ... better ways to achieve their results through queries. ...
    (microsoft.public.excel)
  • Re: Official Status of SQLServer 2005 ADP
    ... solution might be to use ADP. ... With MDB and Linked tables, the only ways of accelerating things are the use ... of Views and the cumbersome use of SQL passthrough queries. ... > SQL Server, and carry on using Access like I aways had. ...
    (microsoft.public.access.adp.sqlserver)
  • Re: SQL Server 2000 and Latching problem
    ... While the way we indexed our tables and the way we wrote the queries etc ... "chances are you are getting latches because you are ... query on the results the query .. ... SQL Server 2000 and Latching problem ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.connect)
  • Re: Sql server as back end
    ... There is an option in the Tools menu, Database Utilities, for Upsize to SQL Server. ... But after that, the queries should generally work, shouldn't they? ...
    (microsoft.public.access.tablesdbdesign)
  • Re: SQL Server (?) performance issues
    ... it's usually that those queries are being blocked by something else. ... Columnist, SQL Server Professional ... exact counters are being watched, but we are being told that all the ... all is fine and there is plenty of spare capacity. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)