Re: SQL Service Accounts
From: Byron Hynes (bph@byronetta.com)
Date: 10/29/02
- Next message: Bob: "Re: Minimum OS Privileges for Server & Agent"
- Previous message: Byron Hynes: "Re: 18454 Log message"
- In reply to: Richard Waymire [MS]: "Re: SQL Service Accounts"
- Next in thread: Richard Waymire [MS]: "Re: SQL Service Accounts"
- Reply: Richard Waymire [MS]: "Re: SQL Service Accounts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Byron Hynes <bph@byronetta.com> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:21:56 -0800
"Richard Waymire [MS]" <rwaymi_ms@microsoft.com> wrote (29 Oct 2002):
> If the user is not a sysadmin then they'll probably need access to a
> proxy account - you can configure that on the server properties ->
> security tab in Enterprise manager.
>
Richard,
Once a system moves into production, isn't it a good idea to consider
having the sa own the job?
I mean, if it's not an sa job, should it be on the server, and if it is,
why should it be left with non-priveledged users? Or, on the other hand, is
having all jobs owned by sa violating the "least required privelege" idea?
- Byron
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Byron P Hynes "He who exercises government by means of his virtue may be compared to the north polar star, which keeps its place and all the stars turn towards it." --Confucius -----------------------------------------------------------------
- Next message: Bob: "Re: Minimum OS Privileges for Server & Agent"
- Previous message: Byron Hynes: "Re: 18454 Log message"
- In reply to: Richard Waymire [MS]: "Re: SQL Service Accounts"
- Next in thread: Richard Waymire [MS]: "Re: SQL Service Accounts"
- Reply: Richard Waymire [MS]: "Re: SQL Service Accounts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]