Re: Record Locking In SQL
From: stu (smcgouga@nospam.co.uk)
Date: 10/21/02
- Next message: mach46: "Re: Test SQL password strenght"
- Previous message: George: "Login failed for User"
- In reply to: Dejan Sarka: "Re: Record Locking In SQL"
- Next in thread: Dejan Sarka: "Re: Record Locking In SQL"
- Reply: Dejan Sarka: "Re: Record Locking In SQL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "stu" <smcgouga@nospam.co.uk> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:23:36 +0100
ahhhh ok. so multi post (you physically post the same msg > once) is bad
and i can see why, but cross posting (sending the same msg to > 1 NG) is OK
and it should be.
I thought you were meaning cross posting was bad which I think ive heard
before or is this nonsense?
cheers
Stu
"Dejan Sarka" <dejan_please_reply_to_newsgroups.sarka@reproms.si> wrote in
message news:#TJjWQQeCHA.2672@tkmsftngp11...
But I was talking about posting
> independent questions to many groups. Check the .server group, there is
the
> same question as here, but not cross-posted.
- Next message: mach46: "Re: Test SQL password strenght"
- Previous message: George: "Login failed for User"
- In reply to: Dejan Sarka: "Re: Record Locking In SQL"
- Next in thread: Dejan Sarka: "Re: Record Locking In SQL"
- Reply: Dejan Sarka: "Re: Record Locking In SQL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|