Re: SA Login
From: BP Margolin (bpmargo@attglobal.net)
Date: 08/15/02
- Next message: Boris Nikolaevich: "Re: Database Roles"
- Previous message: Boris Nikolaevich: "Database Roles"
- In reply to: Boris Nikolaevich: "Re: SA Login"
- Next in thread: C S: "Re: SA Login"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "BP Margolin" <bpmargo@attglobal.net> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:50:08 -0400
Boris,
1. To make your solution feasible, one would also have to either change the
permissions, or completely remove, the BUILTIN\Administrators group.
2. Suppose that the client wants to apply the latest security patch to the
SQL Server instance. Without any way to login as a member of the SysAdmin
group, how is the client supposed to do that?
3. In short, and I really don't mean for this to sound harsh, your proposal
is a bit like buying a home security system from a vendor, but only the
vendor can change the password. Would you really feel safe using that
particular security system. :-)
-------------------------------------------
BP Margolin
Please reply only to the newsgroups.
When posting, inclusion of SQL (CREATE TABLE ..., INSERT ..., etc.) which
can be cut and pasted into Query Analyzer is appreciated.
"Boris Nikolaevich" <boris@nikolaevich.mailshell.com> wrote in message
news:#4Flbr#QCHA.1648@tkmsftngp09...
> When you create a new instance of SQL Server 2000 on a given server, does
> that create a different SA account for that instance?
>
> If so, you could install a new instance of SQL Server, giving SA a custom
> password for that new instance and load your proprietary DB in that new
> instance.
>
> That way, the client could go on his merry way administering the databases
> in the default instance, and you would still have some additional
> technological protection.
>
> Of course, I haven't tried this, and I'm hoping someone can verify whether
> this would work. Additionally, there's the SQL 2000 requirement--if
you're
> running an earlier version, this instancing idea won't work!
>
> HTH,
> Boris
>
>
> "Antony" <mastersons@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
> news:27cd01c243c7$504fdfc0$39ef2ecf@TKMSFTNGXA08...
> > We are using sql authentication, the client insists on
> > having the SA login to maintain other dB's on the same
> > server. Is there a way to deny the SA login access to a
> > particular DB but maintain it's right for other DB's on
> > the server.
> > The built in NT login has been denied access.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Boris Nikolaevich: "Re: Database Roles"
- Previous message: Boris Nikolaevich: "Database Roles"
- In reply to: Boris Nikolaevich: "Re: SA Login"
- Next in thread: C S: "Re: SA Login"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|