Re: Functions
From: Andrew J. Kelly (akelly@targitinteractive.com)
Date: 07/15/02
- Next message: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Functions"
- Previous message: Amy: "Re: SQL 6.5"
- In reply to: Sumesh: "Functions"
- Next in thread: Erland Sommarskog: "Re: Functions"
- Reply: Erland Sommarskog: "Re: Functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Andrew J. Kelly" <akelly@targitinteractive.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:13:38 -0400
No that is a requirement of a UDF, there is no way around it. You should
always qualify your objects with the owner anyway, even sp's. By qualifying
the object it is more likely to use a cached plan and is more efficient
overall behind the scenes.
-- Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP Targitinteractive, Inc. "Sumesh" <Sumesh.Sundareswaran@trsga.com> wrote in message news:1889e01c22c06$15436740$19ef2ecf@tkmsftngxa01... > Everyone, > > I have compiled some common functions into dbo, which the > development team wants access to. After compiling the > functions under dbo, I gave execute rights for all the > functions to the developers. The problem is that when the > developers access it, they have to put the dbo qualifier > in front of the function they need to access. For eg. In > order to run function a, they have to qualify it by dbo.a. > Is there a way I can just just get them to run the > function without the qualifier, as we do with stored > procedures? > > Thanks,
- Next message: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Functions"
- Previous message: Amy: "Re: SQL 6.5"
- In reply to: Sumesh: "Functions"
- Next in thread: Erland Sommarskog: "Re: Functions"
- Reply: Erland Sommarskog: "Re: Functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|