RE: Security Patch Woes
From: Ashwin Kowtha [MS] (ashwin.kowtha@onlinemicrosoft.com)
Date: 06/05/02
- Next message: Richard Waymire [MS]: "Re: NT Authority\System"
- Previous message: Chris Skorlinski: "Re: MS SQL Server 2000 SP2 AV problem with pwdencrypt: possible buffer overflow"
- In reply to: Rich Cowley: "RE: Security Patch Woes"
- Next in thread: Rich Cowley: "RE: Security Patch Woes"
- Reply: Rich Cowley: "RE: Security Patch Woes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: ashwin.kowtha@onlinemicrosoft.com (Ashwin Kowtha [MS]) Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 23:01:22 GMT
Rich,
Could you give me more information on the security patch you applied. Is the hotfix you
applied for the problem mentioned in http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-
US;Q321093. I will try to see if I can reproduce the problem and find the cause.
I would recommend that you contact Microsoft PSS in the meantime to notify them of the issue so
that you get faster service.You should not be charged if it is determined that the issue lies with
the hotfix.
Thanks
Ashwin Kowtha [MS]
This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit. When posting,please state the
version of SQL Server being used and the
error number/exact error message text received, if any.
--------------------
>From: Rich Cowley <rcowley@irsc.com>
>References: <oyDt4mNACHA.1720@cpmsftngxa07>
>X-Newsreader: AspNNTP 1.50 (ActionJackson.com)
>Subject: RE: Security Patch Woes
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Message-ID: <#B$tcROACHA.1864@tkmsftngp04>
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.security
>Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 09:27:11 -0700
>NNTP-Posting-Host: actionjackson37.dsl.frii.net 216.17.146.37
>Lines: 1
>Path: cpmsftngxa08!tkmsftngp01!tkmsftngp04
>Xref: cpmsftngxa08 microsoft.public.sqlserver.security:5923
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.security
>
>No, I don't believe this was a case of a "file in use" on the EXE; all
>SQL services were stopped at the time, and I was able to copy the new
>version into the Binn directory with no problems. (Found no
>"sqlservr.1", either...)
>
>The exact message? "The procedure entry point
>FindNextAvailable@UmsSchedulerQueue@@QAEPAVUmsScheduler@@W4UmsSchedulerA
>lgorithms @@K@Z could not be located in the dynamic link library
>UMS.DLL." For the record, UMS.DLL is dated 8/6/2000 2:51PM, and reads
>v2000.80.194.0.
>
>One of the servers experiencing this problem held only a default
>instance of SQL Server; the other held two named instances (one I
>invented, and one loaded by the DotNet SDK). Is the DotNet SDK instance
>(or any named instances, for that matter) a factor in this problem?
>
>Thanks for your help!
>
>Rich Cowley
>rcowley@irsc.com
>
>*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
>Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
>
- Next message: Richard Waymire [MS]: "Re: NT Authority\System"
- Previous message: Chris Skorlinski: "Re: MS SQL Server 2000 SP2 AV problem with pwdencrypt: possible buffer overflow"
- In reply to: Rich Cowley: "RE: Security Patch Woes"
- Next in thread: Rich Cowley: "RE: Security Patch Woes"
- Reply: Rich Cowley: "RE: Security Patch Woes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|