Re: Not using SA - Then what?
From: Richard Waymire [MS] (rwaymi_ms@microsoft.com)
Date: 05/31/02
- Next message: Chris Beardsley: "Re: Not using SA - Then what?"
- Previous message: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Not using SA - Then what?"
- In reply to: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Not using SA - Then what?"
- Next in thread: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Not using SA - Then what?"
- Reply: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Not using SA - Then what?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Richard Waymire [MS]" <rwaymi_ms@microsoft.com> Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 12:37:15 -0700
in 6.5 you "aliased" users to the dbo user - so as far as SQL Server was
concerned you are dbo. This feature is still in the product but depricated.
-- Richard Waymire, MCSE, MCDBA This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Sue Hoegemeier" <Sue_H@nomail.please> wrote in message news:16iffug02nrp0o9a27hnu98p8p9592eb2b@4ax.com... > This misconception with db_owners happens a lot - even > though there is the example in books online with the user > who is a member of db_owners. > I've always wondered - was there something in 6.5 where it > worked differently or where multiple users could be mapped > to dbo? > > -Sue > > On Fri, 31 May 2002 11:48:15 -0700, "Richard Waymire [MS]" > <rwaymi_ms@microsoft.com> wrote: > > >Actually this isn't quite correct. The users CAN create objects as > >dbo.objectname but it won't happen by default. Only the one and only dbo > >user will have that happen by default. >
- Next message: Chris Beardsley: "Re: Not using SA - Then what?"
- Previous message: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Not using SA - Then what?"
- In reply to: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Not using SA - Then what?"
- Next in thread: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Not using SA - Then what?"
- Reply: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Not using SA - Then what?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|