Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- From: Dan <Dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:29:00 -0700
What Paul does not realize and if he followed US-Cert proper procedure and
doxpara website and the Sans Storm Center then he would realize that DNS
Pollution is and was a huge problem. The technology industry is mainly in
denial about Chris Cquirke, mvp's research and now Dan K's research with DNS
Pollution and the biggest reason this is such a big problem is the NT source
code that has been leaked out over the Internet in the past and is solid
external defense but has no true internal safety like DOS (Disk Operating
System). The majority of people here are indeed smart but they have followed
their senses and bought the company line hook line and sinker and did not go
far enough and ask why the individual operating systems cannot be made safer
on the inside and what is the use of all this external security that will
indeed crumble if there is no internal safety of Disk Operating System or an
equivalent and all users are left with is a cheap command.com interface that
may be satisfactory for many but sucks for the individual home consumers who
I represent. Sure, the price of having two lines of source code is expensive
but how does one company have the right to say which line of source code is
superior and if it is so superior how come we suddenly are having so many
problems with security. It is an easy concept because if you want all your
computers linked as one and one gets a virus then all the others can share
that virus and sicken too. Now, remember if we backtrack and have each
computer become a unique individual that creates and learns without the need
of the collective then we are making progress. Do we really need computers
to become like the Borg where all the computers are connected to one super
computer. Why not let man and womankinds creativity flow from each machine
and not have to be so reliant upon the others that the machine can not do
anything without checking what machines b,c,d,e, and f are doing before the
machine is even confident enough to proceed. I am purposely stretching the
truth and exagerrating but I am making a point on how the entire industry
went wrong when the wrong source code was chosen. The only real solution is
for Microsoft to bring the new source code to the market that is internally
safe with a maintenance operating system and also externally secure.
"~BD~" wrote:
You're welcome, Dan..
For the most part, I understand your posts - all of them!
Stick with it! :)
Dave
--
"Dan" <Dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FA0EE75A-8851-4F30-99E7-C763FFC05BFC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<Warning Long Story --- mainly for Steve Riley {MSFT} benefit as well as
anyone interested and caring enough not to give some smart aleck
response}:->
Thanks BD.
<snip>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- From: FromTheRafters
- Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- From: Root Kit
- Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- References:
- Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- From: Steve Riley [MSFT]
- Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- From: Dan
- Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- From: Dan
- Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- From: Paul Adare - MVP
- Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- From: ~BD~
- Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- From: Dan
- Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- From: ~BD~
- Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows 2000 Certificate server---->2003
- Next by Date: Re: US-Cert Update on New Attacks on Computer Infrastructure
- Previous by thread: Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- Next by thread: Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|