Re: Windows 2000 Certificate server---->2003
- From: Dan <Dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:39:03 -0700
Thanks Brian. As you can see Mark Bohlsen my questions were relevant because
it helped you to explain what you wanted to do and Paul has given his
thoughts and now clearer heads prevail again with Brian Komar whose response
is clear cut and shows that unless you have Enterprise or Data Center SKu's
you will only gain newer bits. As we all can see, Brian Komar, mvp has
cleared away the confusion of the situation and now Mark Bohlsen can make a
better decision in how Mark would like to proceed and going to newer software
does not always mean that the huge investment return on the newer software is
worth the cost. Remember, Microsoft even has over 100+ pages about properly
securing and safeguarding Windows 98 and Windows NT computers available from
their website.
"Brian Komar (MVP)" wrote:
- No issuance of certificates based on version 2 certificate templates = no.
customized certificates-
- No key archival and recovery
- No autoenrollment of user certificates for deployment
- Can only issue version 1 certificates using Automatic Certificate Request
Services for computer certificates
To be honest, you pretty much gain nothing moving from Windows 2000 to
Windows 2003 if you do not run on Enterprise or Data Center Edition SKUs.
The only thing you gain is newer bits
Brian
"Mark Bohlsen" <MarkBohlsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:157E9980-A8A6-4162-8351-BE668CCB06EB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Paul,
Thanks for the response. Dan had me worried, I was hoping that wasn't
going
to be an attempt to answer my question. Anyway, I was wondering if you
could
expand on the 2003 features that I would be missing out on if I went with
2003 standard edition. Thanks in advance.
Mark
"Paul Adare - MVP" wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:52:27 -0700, Mark Bohlsen wrote:
3Hi, I plan to migrate my existing Windows 2000 physical server running
certificate services (subordinate CA in the forest) to a VM, and then
upgrade
the server to Windows 2003 R2. Are there any caveats to an in place
upgrade
of this type? I will have to change the ip address, but the name of
the
server will stay the same. Is there any problems with this? Also,
when I do
the in place upgrade does it automatically detect that certificate
services
is installed and upgrade the certificate database without having to do
anything else? Currently, all of 3 DC's in this child domain are
Windows
2003. Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated, as I haven't
gone
through an upgrade of this type. Thanks in advance.
Ignore Dan, he tries to insert himself into threads even when he has no
idea what he's talking about, as is the case here.
An in-place upgrade from 2000 to 2003 will work just fine and Certificate
Services will be upgraded along with the rest of the OS bits.
Keep in mind however, that you don't get to take full advantage of all of
the new Certificate Services features in 2003 unless your CA is running
the
Enterprise or Datacentre Edition SKU.
--
Paul Adare
MVP - Identity Lifecycle Manager
http://www.identit.ca
That does not compute.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows 2000 Certificate server---->2003
- From: Paul Adare - MVP
- Re: Windows 2000 Certificate server---->2003
- References:
- Re: Windows 2000 Certificate server---->2003
- From: Paul Adare - MVP
- Re: Windows 2000 Certificate server---->2003
- From: Mark Bohlsen
- Re: Windows 2000 Certificate server---->2003
- From: Brian Komar \(MVP\)
- Re: Windows 2000 Certificate server---->2003
- Prev by Date: RADIUS IAS CRL CHECK
- Next by Date: Re: Is DNSSEC supported by Windows?
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows 2000 Certificate server---->2003
- Next by thread: Re: Windows 2000 Certificate server---->2003
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|