Groups
We have roughly 500 offices in a single forest, single domain with no trusts.
Win2003R2 Native mode. Many of our security groups are mail enabled and we
also have many distribution groups.
I know in Exchange 2007 these DL's must be universal but I'm wondering if
these groups should be universal or glocal given our environment with
Exchange 2003.
And lastly can membership slow logon depending on the type of group?
--
Curious
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Connecting Exchange with another organization
... Exchange 2003 running on Exchange 2000 Native ... Single forest, single domain ... Exchange 2000 running on Exchange 2000 Native Mode. ...
(microsoft.public.exchange.connectivity) - Re: Windows 2000 Multiple Domain Trees in a Single Forest
... I have taken the time to read the deployment kit, ... of Multiple domians trees in and single forest, ... As you are probably well aware, Exchange walks hand in hand with AD; ... >Access to resources is governed by security permissions at the resource ...
(microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory) - Re: AD Design Gurus
... different exchange servers the should use different domain. ... > usually work from a basic assumption of using a single forest starting ... > and then justifing using more than one. ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory) - Re: AD Design Gurus
... some good deployment design for your Active Directory. ... child domain design with in a single forest may be a good design) ... Upgrade and migration to Windows Server 2003. ... Deployment of Exchange 2003, here should my personally advice be to re-build ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory) - Re: AD Design Gurus
... IOW - what does the business do and how ... > Exchange Organization that has a single Exchange 5.5 server in each of the ... > with any signifigant design experience in AD in any shape. ... > usually work from a basic assumption of using a single forest starting ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory) |
|
