Re: Does Microsoft Need a New Source Code for the Future?
- From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nospam.invalid>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:33:03 +0100
Sorry to hear about your medical problems, Dan. Good that you are still able
to 'compute'! :)))
Do you know, I'd really *like* to trust Kerry Brown .............. but each
time I ask him to comment on matters discovered in the past he ???? refuses
to come back and answer in a simple and straight-forward manner.
As he knows all too well, though ........... 'The truth will out!'
Dave
"Dan" <Dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:70043619-0826-412A-AB25-67DC7999D7E4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
BD, you can fully trust Kerry Brown. He is good. It just takes getting
used
to the mvps.
<snip>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Does Microsoft Need a New Source Code for the Future?
- From: Dan
- Re: Does Microsoft Need a New Source Code for the Future?
- From: Kerry Brown
- Re: Does Microsoft Need a New Source Code for the Future?
- From: Kerry Brown
- Re: Does Microsoft Need a New Source Code for the Future?
- From: ~BD~
- Re: Does Microsoft Need a New Source Code for the Future?
- From: Dan
- Re: Does Microsoft Need a New Source Code for the Future?
- From: ~BD~
- Re: Does Microsoft Need a New Source Code for the Future?
- Prev by Date: Re: Blocked newspaper reader comments
- Next by Date: Re: Blocked newspaper reader comments
- Previous by thread: Re: Does Microsoft Need a New Source Code for the Future?
- Next by thread: Re: Does Microsoft Need a New Source Code for the Future?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
