Re: redundant enterprise CA
- From: "slimard@xxxxxxxxx" <slimard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:25:44 -0800 (PST)
Is then the redundancy done through AD because they will both
Enterprise CA?
On Jan 9, 5:39 pm, "Brian Komar" <brian.ko...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
There is no clustering support for Server 2003. The redundancy is
accomplished by ensuring that both have the *same* certificate templates
available for enrollment, so that clients can request certificates from
*either* CA.
Brian
<slim...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9b2bc16e-de5a-4252-b545-bfd4a0b21e79@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
I am going to deploy a 2-tiers Windows 2003 PKI. I will set-up a stand-
alone CA and 2 Enterprise CA.
The 2 Enterprise CA are for redundancy. Is there anything special to
make them redundant?
Thank you
Slimo- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: redundant enterprise CA
- From: Brian Komar
- Re: redundant enterprise CA
- References:
- redundant enterprise CA
- From: slimard@xxxxxxxxx
- redundant enterprise CA
- Prev by Date: Re: Messenger Service problem!
- Next by Date: Re: redundant enterprise CA
- Previous by thread: redundant enterprise CA
- Next by thread: Re: redundant enterprise CA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|