Re: Elusive Pages
- From: "Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNoSpam@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:52:15 -0700
"Alpha24" <Alpha24@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:04990E27-DF7D-4474-A448-F54317663641@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2) Actually I was referring to reports of attempts by the gov (US)
"Roger Abell [MVP]" wrote:
1)Are you speaking of how the Google desktop search is
persisting info about use made of it?
2)I am under the impression that for most people there is
a fairly detailed history of search queries also profiled
on the search servers.
Hi Roger. 1) Yes. 2) I presume you are referring to the (normally)
inaccessible Index.dat files and I regard the Desktop search records as
being
in a similar category. I'm well aware that there are widely differing
views
about these sorts of "hidden" records but I consider them to be intrusive.
to get access to archives of past searches stored at the major search
provider companies. We all know that identity, or lack of it, tied to
our surfing history is extremely hard to keep anonymous.
.
- References:
- Re: Elusive Pages
- From: Roger Abell [MVP]
- Re: Elusive Pages
- Prev by Date: Re: Security issue with making NNTP accessible?
- Next by Date: Re: Security issue with making NNTP accessible?
- Previous by thread: Re: Elusive Pages
- Index(es):