Re: Perspectives on Spamhaus's Dilemma
- From: imhotep <imhotep@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:03:33 -0400
Michael Bednarek wrote:
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:26:38 -0400, imhotep wrote in
microsoft.public.security:
[snip]
The real shocking thing is that the US legal system is run by idiots who[snip]
choose to support, or at least protect, spammers...
As a non-US citizen, I find it extremely bizarre that the court didn't
stop for a second to contemplate whether it has any jurisdiction over
this UK-based entity, Spamhaus. Here's their take on this:
<http://www.spamhaus.org/legal/answer.lasso?ref=3>.
Exactly! In the UK spamming is illegal. The US courts are trying to take
Spamhaus domain name away...if they do that, that is total misuse of
power...and should be investigated...
Im
.
- References:
- Re: Perspectives on Spamhaus's Dilemma
- From: Vanguard
- Re: Perspectives on Spamhaus's Dilemma
- From: imhotep
- Re: Perspectives on Spamhaus's Dilemma
- From: Michael Bednarek
- Re: Perspectives on Spamhaus's Dilemma
- Prev by Date: Re: Perspectives on Spamhaus's Dilemma
- Next by Date: Re: Microsoft to release 11 patches
- Previous by thread: Re: Perspectives on Spamhaus's Dilemma
- Next by thread: Re: Perspectives on Spamhaus's Dilemma
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|