Re: Can ANYBODY help resolve this debate?
- From: "Bill Sanderson" <Bill_Sanderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:50:54 -0400
In the case of pop3/smtp mail originating from behind a router implementing
NAT--network address translation--which describes the vast majority of
home/small office routers these days--the same IP address will be in the
headers of the message regardless of which workstation behind the NAT is the
originator.
This may be enough for you--i.e. within the same home or small office might
be sufficient for your purposes--but perhaps not. A nat can theoretically
have 256 client machines, although most are more likely on the order of
between 2 and a dozen or two.
--
"Lee" <Lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FC1B626B-23B8-44DC-96CC-E13A0D7FD444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,
I have a general research enquiry regarding IP tracking and wondered if
you
might be able to help?
I am currently following a debate regarding the claims of 3 apparently
independent sources via an e-mail list and website. Information has
recently
been disclosed which shows a correlation between IP addresses.
One side of the debate argues that the IP correlation is 'proof positive'
that these 3 individual sources are in fact one person with 3 e-mail
accounts.
The other side 'counters' that the IP addresses belong to the mail server
andcannot be used to identify individual machines.
If you are able to resolve this debate I would be very grateful, if not
could you possibly refer me to someone who can?
To reiterate my questions:
1. Is it possible to identify an individual source from IP data?
2. If apparently independent e-mails repeatedly originate from the same
IP's, could this indicate that they are, in fact coming from the same
source?
With your permission I would like to post your response on the forum at, I
will of course reference the website and remove any names if required.
Thanks
for your time.
Kind regards,
Lee Nicholson.
debate links:
http://lucianarchy.proboards21.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=projectserpo&thread=1150104156&page=1#1150396456
http://www.realityuncovered.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=144&start=120
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: Why not patch all windows and not just legal copies
- Next by Date: Re: Why not patch all windows and not just legal copies
- Previous by thread: Urgent: Cusrmgr.exe
- Next by thread: Re: Can ANYBODY help resolve this debate?
- Index(es):