Re: IPsec Over Tunnel
- From: "Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 18:54:50 -0500
As your setup is described Windows XP should be using transport for host to
host ipsec and you say it works for that. When you try to use tunnel in a
host to host scenario it does not work which does not surprise me and maybe
it has something to do with the ipsec tunnel endpoint and IP filer list
being on the same network. I think your best bet is to get the Apple
computer to work in transport mode which is how ipsec should be configured
in a host to host network. --- Steve
<Desert.Bound@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1147908856.114201.322600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am trying to encrypt my wireless traffic with IPsec. My
configuration is as follows:
OpenBSD 3.8 gateway (192.168.100.20) connected to Linksys accesspoint
via crossover cable.
Macintosh OS X 10.4 (192.168.100.200) AirPort
Windows XP SP2 (192.168.100.120) Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG
I am using isakmpd on the OpenBSD computer, racoon on OS X and ipseccmd
on Windows. If I configure transport policies the setup works
correctly. However, if I use tunnel, the Macintosh works correctly,
but the Windows computer does not.
Below are the ipseccmd commands I am using for Windows.
Transport mode:
ipseccmd -u
ipseccmd -f 192.168.100.120=192.168.100.0/255.255.255.0 -n
ESP[3DES,MD5]1800s -a cert:"C=US, S=Missouri, L=Saint Louis, O=Home
LAN" -1s 3DES-SHA-2 -1k 1800s
ipseccmd -f 192.168.100.0/255.255.255.0=192.168.100.120 -n
ESP[3DES,MD5]1800s -a cert:"C=US, S=Missouri, L=Saint Louis, O=Home
LAN" -1s 3DES-SHA-2 -1k 1800s
After executing these commands, I can ping 192.168.100.20. After
several "Negotiating IP Security" messages, I receive replies from the
remote computer. I can ping from the OpenBSD computer to the Windows
computer as well.
Tunnel mode:
ipseccmd -u
ipseccmd -f 192.168.100.120=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -t 192.168.100.20 -n
ESP[3DES,SHA]1800s -a cert:"C=US, S=Missouri, L=Saint Louis, O=Home
LAN" -1s 3DES-SHA-2 -1k 1800s
ipseccmd -f 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0=192.168.100.120 -t 192.168.100.120 -n
ESP[3DES,SHA]1800s -a cert:"C=US, S=Missouri, L=Saint Louis, O=Home
LAN" -1s 3DES-SHA-2 -1k 1800s
After executing these commands and pinging 192.168.100.20 I receive
several "Negotiating IP Security" messages again. However, instead of
receiving replies, I now get "Request timed out". If I examine the
Oakley.log file, I can see that SA is successfuly netotiated. I would
expect that if firewalls or some other ICMP block was in place, that it
would affect both transport and tunnel mode.
Any suggestions?
thanks,
Michael
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPsec Over Tunnel
- From: Desert . Bound
- Re: IPsec Over Tunnel
- References:
- IPsec Over Tunnel
- From: Desert . Bound
- IPsec Over Tunnel
- Prev by Date: IPsec Over Tunnel
- Next by Date: Re: Printers dont assign after GPO Security changes...
- Previous by thread: IPsec Over Tunnel
- Next by thread: Re: IPsec Over Tunnel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading