Re: Consolidate Services logon account?
- From: "Roger Abell [MVP]" <mvpNoSpam@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:06:46 -0700
Example con
When the zero day exploit of the Backup Exec client service (two in
short order actually) hit the network, if your Backup Exec Tcp was
exposed to the world you likely were rootkitted.
Were I that intruder, leveraged in via the Backup Exec client agent
service, ie. I am running as SvcUserX, I look around and see that
there are a number of other processes running as "me", like SQL
Server, etc. I would now have a playground.
"Scott Goldman" <ScottGoldman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6B40F48E-29A1-4E8E-80FE-237C95B9FBF1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On a Windows 2003 server, what are the pros and cons of using the same
"Log
On As" account information for various services, such as Backup Exec, SQL
Server, and Mcafee EPO?
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Norton Antivirus 2006 Subscription problem ?
- Next by Date: Re: appears to loose authentication
- Previous by thread: Norton Antivirus 2006 Subscription problem ?
- Next by thread: Re: Using SSL Certificate for TSAC on NLB Windows 2003 Terminal Server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
