Re: WMF FIX
- From: Rosanne <08nxixk02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 03:42:29 GMT
Pam wrote:
> Does anyone have any advice on this? I read a couple of threads about this
> temp fix, but can't find any definitive advice as to whether or not this is
> something to consider *until* next Tuesday's (1-10) release. Normally I
> would hold GRC in relatively high regard in most cases, but I don't know
> what to think of this, since GRC is just a sanctioned host for the authors
> work. Obviously not savvy enough to know who Ilfak Guilfanov is.
>
> TIA
>
> Pam
>
>
F-Secure (www.f-secure.com) and SANS (isc.sans.org) recommend it, too.
The fix is solidly white-hat, has been tested and scrutinized. F-Secure
has installed it on their own machines. For all of that, it's still
essentially a beta. I'm using it, but I've done a disk image and am
willing to reinstall my OS if something goes dreadfully wrong.
I think it's overall better to have it, than not.
--
~ Rosanne
Don’t save my sneakemail address – when it gets spammed, it gets changed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: WMF FIX
- From: Phil Wright
- Re: WMF FIX
- References:
- WMF FIX
- From: Phil Wright
- Re: WMF FIX
- From: Pam
- WMF FIX
- Prev by Date: Re: WMF FIX
- Next by Date: Re: WMF FIX
- Previous by thread: Re: WMF FIX
- Next by thread: Re: WMF FIX
- Index(es):