Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- From: "Shenan Stanley" <newshelper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:36:50 -0600
shawn modersohn wrote:
> I don't feel like using reg hacks and special permissions to enable
> virus defs to be automatically downloaded and installed by limited
> user accounts. I haven't seen any AV software that installs to the
> home directory, I believe they all essentially insist on something
> in the 'Program Files' directory. Obviously, I am unwilling to
> create administrator accounts for all users just for virus defs and
> thereby creating a giant catch 22. The way I see it, if I can't
> install virus defs in a limited user account, I couldn't install *most*
> viruses either. I am about to eliminate this licensing and
> subscription headache altogether and opt for mandatory limited user
> accounts and XP upgrades. Any opinions? How would a sasser or
> other exploit potentially deal with limited user accounts? Thanks.
What type of antivirus application are you trying to use that doesn't work
for all users?
--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- From: shawn modersohn
- Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- References:
- Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- From: shawn modersohn
- Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft Security Advisory (912840): Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution
- Next by Date: Re: Windows cannot connect to the domain
- Previous by thread: Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- Next by thread: Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|