Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- From: "Tom [Pepper] Willett" <tompepper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:30:30 -0600
Without AV protection, you will not be protected against viruses.
Tom
"shawn modersohn" <smmodersohn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OdFUW9MDGHA.4080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|I don't feel like using reg hacks and special permissions to enable
| virus defs to be automatically downloaded and installed by limited user
| accounts. I haven't seen any AV software that installs to the home
| directory, I believe they all essentially insist on something in the
| 'Program Files' directory. Obviously, I am unwilling to create
| administrator accounts for all users just for virus defs and thereby
| creating a giant catch 22. The way I see it, if I can't install virus
| defs in a limited user account, I couldn't install *most* viruses
| either. I am about to eliminate this licensing and subscription
| headache altogether and opt for mandatory limited user accounts and XP
| upgrades. Any opinions? How would a sasser or other exploit
| potentially deal with limited user accounts? Thanks.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- From: shawn modersohn
- Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- References:
- Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- From: shawn modersohn
- Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- Prev by Date: Re: Service running as Local system account Unable to map drive on ano
- Next by Date: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- Previous by thread: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- Next by thread: Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|