Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- From: shawn modersohn <smmodersohn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:22:15 -0600
I don't feel like using reg hacks and special permissions to enable virus defs to be automatically downloaded and installed by limited user accounts. I haven't seen any AV software that installs to the home directory, I believe they all essentially insist on something in the 'Program Files' directory. Obviously, I am unwilling to create administrator accounts for all users just for virus defs and thereby creating a giant catch 22. The way I see it, if I can't install virus defs in a limited user account, I couldn't install *most* viruses either. I am about to eliminate this licensing and subscription headache altogether and opt for mandatory limited user accounts and XP upgrades. Any opinions? How would a sasser or other exploit potentially deal with limited user accounts? Thanks.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- From: PA Bear
- Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- From: Shenan Stanley
- Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- From: Tom [Pepper] Willett
- Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- Prev by Date: Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- Next by Date: Re: Microsoft Security Advisory (912840): Vulnerability in Graphics Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution
- Previous by thread: Re: windows xp new user
- Next by thread: Re: Limited Users / No AV software --How Safe
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|