Re: ADAM instead of setting up domain in the 'perimeter' ? Sharepoint+AD

From: Roger Abell [MVP] (mvpNoSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 10/14/05


Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:34:44 -0700

Yes, and yes.
The "traditional" way, as you outlined with the AD trust, has since the
intoduction of Adam had an alternative, and, depending on the resource
access needs this Adam alternative can also be combined with a more
restrictively used AD trust so the protocol transitioning out of Adam
can also allow "gated" access to those resource using Windows principals.
The other yes is that you definitely should evaluate what ADFS v1 in
the R2 release cycle will bring as added alternatives.

"Marlon Brown" <nomail@brown.com> wrote in message
news:eVWnPW0zFHA.904@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> We are currently planning to setup an AD forest in the perimeter network
> to accomodate a number of front/back end Sharepoint servers and DC's, etc.
> The idea is that if extranet users need to access Sharepoint from the
> extranet, they could authenticate using accounts existing in such
> "Domain-Perimeter" and avoid coming "inside" my organization for future
> access. Such "Domain-Perimeter" would be setup in a separate Forest with
> an one-way trust relationship to my corporate domain.
>
> I just thought more about it:
> How about instead of setting up an entire domain infrastructure to
> accomodate such security need of account isolation, I just setup an AD/AM
> structure in a Sharepoint servers "inside" my organization. That way I
> could accomplish the same goal of providing external users with "isolated"
> accounts from my corporate domain and I could make the whole
> implementation much easier.
>
> Let me know your thoughts and whether that would work.
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Trust not working beyween 2 Windows 2003 Domains
    ... If you want to establish trust relationship for the purpose of resource ... the servers where the resource reside ... I have created a 2 way trust between the 2 domains, ... When a member server wants to add local groups from the opposing domain to ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: finalize() overhead
    ... of explicit resource clean up. ... Do you trust the finalizer to release locks for you ... code to be in a sane state if a forgotten lock is suddenly ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: recurrent drive mappings fail
    ... routinely mapped drives to a domain B share using their domain B credentials. ... We recently completed a two way trust between domains. ... resource but the recurrent mapping will never hold. ... issue but I am wondering what is happening to block the drive mappings. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: recurrent drive mappings fail
    ... We recently completed a two way trust between domains. ... resource but the recurrent mapping will never hold. ... issue but I am wondering what is happening to block the drive mappings. ... Each user has an identically named account in both domains with the same ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: Final proof of TA madness?
    ... In message, Michael Calwell writes ... simply feels she knows Adam well enough to trust his judgement is something which hasn't been revealed. ...
    (uk.media.radio.archers)

Quantcast