Re: Logon Type Identification
From: Steven L Umbach (n9rou_at_nospam-comcast.net)
Date: 09/28/05
- Next message: James Knott: "Re: Why IP address is fixed everytime connected to the Internet?"
- Previous message: James Knott: "Re: Why IP address is fixed everytime connected to the Internet?"
- Maybe in reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Logon Type Identification"
- Next in thread: Cindy: "Re: Logon Type Identification"
- Reply: Cindy: "Re: Logon Type Identification"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:15:04 -0500
It does not mean that the user had changed his password - just unlocked the
operating system. Often the screen savers is configured to do this
automatically after a period of idle time or the user locked his computer to
protect access to it using his user account using control-alt-delete - lock
computer. --- Steve
"Cindy" <Cindy@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:63815DDC-B183-4A30-B147-5C629055A52D@microsoft.com...
> Thanks, it was a laptop and users use domain cached logons. Additional
> information|user does not show password change near this time. I will
> have
> to talk with user when he gets back in town. "Steven L Umbach" wrote:
>
>> The link below will help. Type 7 means someone unlocked their computer
>> and
>> type 11 is a cached interactive logon which could be of concern unless it
>> is
>> found on laptop computers not connected to the domain. Cached logon means
>> the user logged onto their computer with domain credentials even though a
>> domain controller could not be contacted. For local network computers
>> this
>> could mean a network connectivity problem, dns misconfiguration for the
>> domain controller or domain client, or the user may have intentionally
>> unplugged their network cable to bypass logon/startup scripts and Group
>> Policy refresh. Cached domain logons can be disabled via security
>> olicy. --- Steve
>>
>> http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/Logon-Types.html
>>
>> Logon Type 7 - Unlock
>> Hopefully the workstations on your network automatically start a password
>> protected screen saver when a user leaves their computer so that
>> unattended
>> workstations are protected from malicious use. When a user returns to
>> their
>> workstation and unlocks the console, Windows treats this as a logon and
>> logs
>> the appropriate Logon/Logoff event but in this case the logon type will
>> be
>> 7 - identifying the event as a workstation unlock attempt. Failed logons
>> with logon type 7 indicate either a user entering the wrong password or a
>> malicious user trying to unlock the computer by guessing the password.
>>
>> Logon Type 11 - CachedInteractive
>> Windows supports a feature called Cached Logons which facilitate mobile
>> users. When you are not connected to the your organization's network and
>> attempt to logon to your laptop with a domain account there's no domain
>> controller available to the laptop with which to verify your identity. To
>> solve this problem, Windows caches a hash of the credentials of the last
>> 10
>> interactive domain logons. Later when no domain controller is available,
>> Windows uses these hashes to verify your identity when you attempt to
>> logon
>> with a domain account.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Cindy" <Cindy@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:8969FBAA-4CF8-4557-B68C-8C1C73E561F0@microsoft.com...
>> > Hi:
>> > I would like to know what the different logon type numbers in logon
>> > events.
>> > I know Type2 is interactive logon but type 7 and 11 also show up in
>> > event
>> > logs on one of our laptops. I am not looking for the Event numbers,
>> > rather
>> > what type of logon was attempted by the different logon type #s.
>> >
>> > I searched Technet but could only find event numbers for that type 2
>> > was
>> > interactive logon.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
- Next message: James Knott: "Re: Why IP address is fixed everytime connected to the Internet?"
- Previous message: James Knott: "Re: Why IP address is fixed everytime connected to the Internet?"
- Maybe in reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Logon Type Identification"
- Next in thread: Cindy: "Re: Logon Type Identification"
- Reply: Cindy: "Re: Logon Type Identification"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|