Re: should administrator lock pages in memory?
From: Steven L Umbach (n9rou_at_nospam-comcast.net)
Date: 09/19/05
- Previous message: Milrose Lewis: "Re: How to tell if a firewall alert is suspicious or not"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:42:00 -0500
I would leave it a defined with no users which is what the Threats and
Countermeasures Guide for Windows 2003 and XP from Microsoft Recommends. I
can't think of a reason why the Security Guide would recommend that
administrators be defined. --- Steve
"Frank" <Frank@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6B12573A-0275-4742-979A-3F2512282306@microsoft.com...
> Dear, all.
>
> Windows 2003 default setting, nobody could lock pages in memory. But in
> microsoft recommend in high security organization, should define
> administrator have this right. Could you tell me the reason?
>
> Thanks.
> Frank
- Previous message: Milrose Lewis: "Re: How to tell if a firewall alert is suspicious or not"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
