Re: anti-spyware vs antivirus vs firewall
From: Spacey Spade (spaceygum_at_hotpop.com)
Date: 09/15/05
- Next message: Don Varnau: "Re: could not upgrade file %1 from %2 %1: %2 kb896727"
- Previous message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Need logon and Logoff data for 30 days"
- In reply to: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: anti-spyware vs antivirus vs firewall"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: anti-spyware vs antivirus vs firewall"
- Reply: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: anti-spyware vs antivirus vs firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 14 Sep 2005 16:21:44 -0700
> First a firewall simply blocks or allows network traffic in or out
> based on characteristics of the traffic. Often the characteristics
> are only what protocol and port, what external IP, or to what
> application on the receiving machine the receiving port is
> bound. While there are firewall type devices that can do
> extensive examination of what is in the packets that (might) pass
> through, these are higher-end devices. So, usually device that is
> simply a "firewall" device does not take note of whether there is
> a virus or worm or spyware or . . .
What ports/protocols/applications are normally open on a default
windows xp computer without a firewall, that would allow a worm to
infect it? Are these required for web surfing and email, such that I
can turn them off without affecting them?
- Next message: Don Varnau: "Re: could not upgrade file %1 from %2 %1: %2 kb896727"
- Previous message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Need logon and Logoff data for 30 days"
- In reply to: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: anti-spyware vs antivirus vs firewall"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: anti-spyware vs antivirus vs firewall"
- Reply: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: anti-spyware vs antivirus vs firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|