Re: Dicussion on where RADIUS server should be
From: Imhotep (NoSpam_at_NoThanks.com)
Date: 06/16/05
- Next message: ray: "windows media player 9"
- Previous message: Doug Neal [MSFT]: "New MSSecure.XML Version 2005.06.15.0 Now Available"
- In reply to: Marlon: "Dicussion on where RADIUS server should be"
- Next in thread: Marlon: "Re: Dicussion on where RADIUS server should be"
- Reply: Marlon: "Re: Dicussion on where RADIUS server should be"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:06:24 -0700
Marlon wrote:
> All network diagrams I've seen so far indicates that a RADIUS server
> (Windows IAS, ACS, or whatever) should be placed in the 'internal' network
> and establish communications with DC's there. Then if an external user
> attempts to connect via VPN (DMZ), then I would allow only the ports
> necessary from the VPN concentrator to the RADIUS server and
> pre-authenticate users at that point.
>
> I have a security guy fellow here that tells me that the RADIUS server
> should be placed in the "DMZ" instead. Does this make sense at all ?
As a general rule your authentication server (Radius, Tacacs, etc) SHOULD be
internal. Why? Because you really want to protect (and tightly restrict
control) this server from being hacked....Losing your Radius server would
be a disaster!
Now if your security guy is saying something like "we will put the Radius
server in it's own DMZ (ie by itself) and strictly control access to it,
this is not a bad idea.
Remember a couple of things about Radius, communications (sessions) are NOT
encrypted (ie can be sniffed). I would highly recommend using TACACS++
instead of Radius...I would also suggest not using the domain passwords for
your external (VPN) access. I would suggest using keyfobs instead. Why?
Because this would give multiple layers of security and force a
hacker/cracker to crack two accounts per person before getting full access.
This also allows you to protect your self from weak user passwords, etc,
etc....
-Imhotep
- Next message: ray: "windows media player 9"
- Previous message: Doug Neal [MSFT]: "New MSSecure.XML Version 2005.06.15.0 Now Available"
- In reply to: Marlon: "Dicussion on where RADIUS server should be"
- Next in thread: Marlon: "Re: Dicussion on where RADIUS server should be"
- Reply: Marlon: "Re: Dicussion on where RADIUS server should be"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|