Re: Restricting other users
From: Roger Abell (mvpNOSpam_at_asu.edu)
Date: 06/01/05
- Next message: Roger Abell: "Re: Policy's in Windows Server 2003 Ent"
- Previous message: Salvador Manaois III: "Re: Security Templates"
- In reply to: PA Bear: "Re: Restricting other users"
- Next in thread: Paul Adare: "Re: Restricting other users"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 21:37:09 -0700
"PA Bear" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:uVo%235agZFHA.796@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Paul Adare wrote:
> > In article <#cjDo5WZFHA.3272@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl>, in the
> > microsoft.public.security news group, PA Bear <PABearMVP@gmail.com>
> > says...
> >
> > > What ever happen to the word "No"...and backing it up?
> > >
> >
> > Last time I checked folks don't come to this news group for parenting
> > advice.
>
> Sorry but that's exactly what OP was asking about.
In some ways yes, it was, but what was actually asked was
> Is there any way of locking the computer that still allows 'fast user
> switching' to be enabled while preventing everyone who is not an
> administrator from loggin on?
-- Roger
- Next message: Roger Abell: "Re: Policy's in Windows Server 2003 Ent"
- Previous message: Salvador Manaois III: "Re: Security Templates"
- In reply to: PA Bear: "Re: Restricting other users"
- Next in thread: Paul Adare: "Re: Restricting other users"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
