Re: registry hacked under XP limited account
From: Karl Levinson, mvp (levinson_k_at_despammed.com)
Date: 05/31/05
- Next message: nancie: "SpywareBlaster update"
- Previous message: Doug Neal [MSFT]: "New MSSecure.XML Version 2005.05.19.0 Now Available - JPN and FRN only"
- In reply to: Stefan Kanthak: "Re: registry hacked under XP limited account"
- Next in thread: lecter: "Re: registry hacked under XP limited account"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 21:46:47 -0400
"Stefan Kanthak" <postmaster@1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa> wrote in message
news:O1XkgABZFHA.2288@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> > Running as limited user does prevent much spyware and adware today, but
only
> > because the authors of that malware see no need to make their programs
work
> > as limited users. This tactic will NOT be effective against future
malware.
>
> WRONG: running as limited or restricted user on a properly setup XP or
> 2K system prevents malware from infecting or compromising the system
> itself or other user accounts.
This means nothing unless multiple users are using the computer. If this is
a single-user system, making the virus unload when the user logs out or
preventing infection of other system accounts means very little.
- Next message: nancie: "SpywareBlaster update"
- Previous message: Doug Neal [MSFT]: "New MSSecure.XML Version 2005.05.19.0 Now Available - JPN and FRN only"
- In reply to: Stefan Kanthak: "Re: registry hacked under XP limited account"
- Next in thread: lecter: "Re: registry hacked under XP limited account"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|