Re: Meaning of ADS_SD_CONTROL_SE_DACL_AUTO_INHERITED
From: Jan Nielsen (janielsen_at_online.nospam)
Date: 05/30/05
- Next message: Joe: "Re: Restricting other users"
- Previous message: Knox: "Re: registry hacked under XP limited account"
- In reply to: Crouchie1998: "Re: Meaning of ADS_SD_CONTROL_SE_DACL_AUTO_INHERITED"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell: "Re: Meaning of ADS_SD_CONTROL_SE_DACL_AUTO_INHERITED"
- Reply: Roger Abell: "Re: Meaning of ADS_SD_CONTROL_SE_DACL_AUTO_INHERITED"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 23:30:56 +0200
Ok, I'll try that group. I just thought the chance of catching an expert on
ACLs was higher in a security group.
Yes, I found the description in MSDN too. But I don't think it explains very
well the meaning of that bit. At least I don't get it.
The only other description I found was at:
http://www.fim.uni-linz.ac.at/Diplomarbeiten/diplomarbeit_helml/diplomarbeit_helml.pdf
Unfortunately it's written in German. But what I understand from it, is that
the system sets this bit automatically, and it indicates that at least one
ACEs is inherited.
If this is true I'm really confused, as this is not what I see after I've
written the SD from my code.
Jan Nielsen
- Next message: Joe: "Re: Restricting other users"
- Previous message: Knox: "Re: registry hacked under XP limited account"
- In reply to: Crouchie1998: "Re: Meaning of ADS_SD_CONTROL_SE_DACL_AUTO_INHERITED"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell: "Re: Meaning of ADS_SD_CONTROL_SE_DACL_AUTO_INHERITED"
- Reply: Roger Abell: "Re: Meaning of ADS_SD_CONTROL_SE_DACL_AUTO_INHERITED"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]