Re: Security? Right.

From: Imhotep (NoSpam_at_nothanks.net)
Date: 05/19/05 

Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 14:32:53 -0700

Mark Randall wrote:

> No, its called a corprate server, of which freedom of speech does not
> exist should it harm the owner.
>

By the way, Freedom of Speech is a constitutional right (US). It is not
negated because it is on a corporate server.

-Im

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Liberals save freedom of speech by one vote
    ... It may be a political statement. ... Yeah but freedom of speech also has limits. ... But I agree with the "causing harm" concept, but where do you then pull ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion
    ... Freedom of speech is independent of the venue. ... If the owner provides the medium, ... And if the mall owner doesn't care, you can rant all you want in the parking ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: Endeavour or Endeavor?
    ... exemption (likely to cause harm, unnecessary, and actually causing ... or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, ... Here is an interesting article about Freedom of Speech applied to the internet. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Security? Right.
    ... No, its called a corprate server, of which freedom of speech does not exist ... should it harm the owner. ... Mark Randall ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: dear "A teamster" take note
    ... they intended to cause harm, they soon found out that "freedom of ... speech" has it's price. ...
    (misc.transport.trucking)
Quantcast