Re: There needs to be an international policy
From: Mark Randall (markyr_at_REMOVETHISgoogle.ANDTHIScom)
Date: 04/13/05
- Next message: herbieb09: "Re: toolbar history"
- Previous message: Leandro - CBMM: "Re: toolbar history"
- In reply to: Jeff Cochran: "Re: There needs to be an international policy"
- Next in thread: Robert Moir: "Re: There needs to be an international policy"
- Reply: Robert Moir: "Re: There needs to be an international policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:07:02 +0100
I find it VERY hard to believe that such a system wouldent be relativly easy
to construct using todays technology. Distributed processing could help
enormously.
Once something is identified as spam reliably, it is very easy to start
knocking it out circulation in the internet; futher more you wait for these
people who set up these spam websites to start sending out emails to them,
and apply relevant filters to store the information on which domains are
sent, you find the worst offenders, you ban them from registering domains IF
you can, if only ones for your country.
I mean sweet jesus... if I can think up these ideas... surley there are at
least a few people (heh...) cleverer than me who could better them and
impliment them.
-- - Mark Randall http://zetech.swehli.com "Jeff Cochran" <jeff.nospam@zina.com> wrote in message news:4260373e.75836116@msnews.microsoft.com... > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:50:19 +0100, "Mark Randall" > <markyr@REMOVETHISgoogle.ANDTHIScom> wrote: > >>You know... I thought it was meant to be techies in this group... >> >>1) Take one 16 processor 64Ghz server class machine... >>2) Add 128GB of RAM >>3) Install Unix >>4) Install SQL server >>5)Write software for global collaberation between major ISP's to track the >>number of emails going out from a certain IP, domain or host over a period >>of a day. >>6) Have the ISP mail servers drop the aforementioned emails unless on an >>'authorised' list which companies must register. >> >>Problem solved. Mass email deleted because its just that, mass mail. > > Except you'll overload the server, have issues with network latency > and all the bad email companies will regsiter anyway. > > Jeff > > >>- Mark Randall >>http://zetech.swehli.com >> >>"George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>news:%23PVypSYOFHA.3076@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >>The major contributors to spam on the Internet are China, Korea and >>Brasil. >>If these countries had their IP addresses banned on the Internet then 90% >>of >>the spam on the Internet would cease. If it is felt that banning these >>countries outright is too draconian then maybe a policy needs to be >>initiated. I suggest a policy such as if these countries do not make a >>concerted effort to shut down their spamming servers, say after 2 years, >>then they are removed from Internet access. How? Well all DNS Servers >>are >>instructed to ignore the IP ranges of those countries. In other words >>they >>are no longer registered in the major hubs for DNS. This policy or one >>like >>it should be set up as a Recommendation and implemented for countries >>which >>"encourage" their spamming servers. How do they encourage it? They >>ignore >>abuse notifications; they use false information registering their domains. >
- Next message: herbieb09: "Re: toolbar history"
- Previous message: Leandro - CBMM: "Re: toolbar history"
- In reply to: Jeff Cochran: "Re: There needs to be an international policy"
- Next in thread: Robert Moir: "Re: There needs to be an international policy"
- Reply: Robert Moir: "Re: There needs to be an international policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|