Re: [ANN]: TCPDUMP for Windows
From: Arkady Frenkel (arkadyf_at_hotmailxdotx.com)
Date: 03/30/05
- Next message: Stefan Kanthak: "Re: Delete File"
- Previous message: Matt Gibson: "Re: Reporting a Microsoft bug"
- In reply to: Edward Smirnov: "Re: [ANN]: TCPDUMP for Windows"
- Next in thread: Edward Smirnov: "Re: [ANN]: TCPDUMP for Windows"
- Reply: Edward Smirnov: "Re: [ANN]: TCPDUMP for Windows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:49:45 +0200
If you stand you don't use driver ( so no admin rights required for
installation ) , do your tcpdump catch netbios messages ?
Arkady
"Edward Smirnov" <ed@microolap.com> wrote in message
news:u$qpXyRNFHA.1096@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hello,
>
>> What would be reasons to select your product over Windump?
>
> Single .EXE file, no any preinstalled packet capture drivers required:
>
> Just imagine that you're going to use someone else's PC, e.g. you need to
> audit some network from several workstations and have no ability to
> connect
> to it with your own hardware (and you don't want to reboot these PCs,
> btw).
>
> 1Gbit network support:
>
> Certainly, you may need something like NetOptics wiretap to direct whole
> 1Gbit traffic to your PC with tcpdump for Windows launched, but it can
> capture it totally. The worst packet loss value we had in our experiments
> on
> 1Gbit networks was approximately 3000000/200 "captured and saved to
> file"/"lost" ratio.
>
>> I'm not worried too much about Winpcap requirement.
>
> Good for you :)
>
> ---
> WBR,
> Edward Smirnov
> http://microolap.com
>
>
- Next message: Stefan Kanthak: "Re: Delete File"
- Previous message: Matt Gibson: "Re: Reporting a Microsoft bug"
- In reply to: Edward Smirnov: "Re: [ANN]: TCPDUMP for Windows"
- Next in thread: Edward Smirnov: "Re: [ANN]: TCPDUMP for Windows"
- Reply: Edward Smirnov: "Re: [ANN]: TCPDUMP for Windows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|