Re: ActiveX or client installer

From: Michael Pelletier (mjpelletier_at_mjpelletier.com)
Date: 03/30/05


Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:08:54 -0800

Benjamin van den Broek wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The company I work for has build a completely browser based application.
> As a sales argument we say that you don't need to install a (fat) client
> on your user machines. However, our application only runs in the browser
> if you allow a browser plug-in (ActiveX) component to be installed. Some
> people say that allowing an ActiveX component is in principal the same as
> providing a client installer.
>
> The following questions:
> 1) Do companies differentiate between client installers and allowing
> ActiveX components, or are the two the same to them?
> 2) Does a Browser plug-in require more setup (deployment) and maintenance
> cost than a client installer?
> 3) Is it possible (from a client viewpoint) to limit the ActiveX component
> (f.e. allow everything, except file-system access)
>
> Thanx in advance!
>
> Regards,
> Ben

Well, first be warned. Most companies, like mine, BLOCK ALL ACTIVEX. Also,
at home people are getting in the habit of blocking it. Infact many people
are switching to a non-IE browser. So, I would recommend to you to stay
away from using ActiveX...

Most companies, and home users, do not mind installing something if they
need it. I would go with a client installer/application. I would also go
with a browser independent application as we have started migrating users
to Firefox and will continue to do so. Any companies that we purchase
software from will have to support it or we will not buy it no matter
what...

Michael

-- 


Relevant Pages

  • Re: ActiveX versus Client Installer
    ... > runs in the browser if you allow a browser plug-in component ... Some people say that allowing an ActiveX component is ... > in principal the same as providing a client installer. ... In Memoriam - MVP Alex Nichol ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
  • Re: Are Java and JavaScript really so malicious for Windows system
    ... >> I was referring to ActiveX. ... >>> Whatever the browser, once you break out of the sandbox, your account is ... I use FF/TB in a limited account for everyday work. ... I use many extensions in FF/TB. ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: Someone look at this HijackThis log, please?
    ... Of course you'll need a browser to replace it, ... document object modeling as well as any other javascript or activeX ... Getting rid of IE will get rid of this. ... McAfee, you could end up with the gross system instabilities that McAfee ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: field validation (was Re: COBOL/DB2 Date edit question)
    ... that amount of time on the "Cross Browser" problem.. ... My web site neither depends on nor uses ActiveX that would be downloaded to ... a Client (I certainly use COM and ActiveX on the server). ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: field validation (was Re: COBOL/DB2 Date edit question)
    ... that amount of time on the "Cross Browser" problem.. ... My web site neither depends on nor uses ActiveX that would be downloaded ... a Client (I certainly use COM and ActiveX on the server). ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)