Re: Microsoft Security Groups
matthewpascucci_at_yahoo.com
Date: 03/28/05
- Next message: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- Previous message: Dan S: "The Kerberos subsystems encountered a PAC verification error"
- In reply to: matthewpascucci_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Microsoft Security Groups"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell: "Re: Microsoft Security Groups"
- Reply: Roger Abell: "Re: Microsoft Security Groups"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 27 Mar 2005 19:19:31 -0800
Sorry, I forgot to add this last part I my last post.
In one of the books I'm currently reading it states this about Global
Groups:
Global Groups
Membership=You can put any user, computer or other global group from
the same domain.
Permissions=Global groups can be added to other global groups in any
domain in the forest and assigned permissions.
Don't these to contidict themselves?? If you can assign a global group
to another global group in a different domain(permission), doesn't that
go against the adding members only from the same domain(membership)??
Am I reading this wrong??? When they say permsissions they are meaning
on an object or resource???
- Next message: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- Previous message: Dan S: "The Kerberos subsystems encountered a PAC verification error"
- In reply to: matthewpascucci_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Microsoft Security Groups"
- Next in thread: Roger Abell: "Re: Microsoft Security Groups"
- Reply: Roger Abell: "Re: Microsoft Security Groups"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|