Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME
From: glee (glee29_at_spamindspring.com)
Date: 03/27/05
- Next message: glee: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- Previous message: John Corliss: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- In reply to: Bill in Co.: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- Next in thread: Bill in Co.: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- Reply: Bill in Co.: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- Reply: Rick T: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:04:38 -0500
The info I am aware of is that IE6 caused the problem, and IE6 SP1 remedied it. Did
you in fact actually upgrade to IE6 SP1 to see if there was an improvement?
-- Glen Ventura, MS MVP Shell/User, A+ http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm "Bill in Co." <someone@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:eIODlmpMFHA.2252@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > Upgrading to IE 6 SP1 (or IE 6 by itself) is what resulted in that file copy > and delete problem in the first place, for Win98 users! That's what > Frank's DLL swapping solution resolves. ( > http://www.frankprovo.com/win98ie6filesproblem.htm ) > > I can bear testimony to that, cause that's where I'm at now. The only > other alternative was to rollback to IE 5.5 SP2 - or just live with the > problem, which I'm not willing to do. > > Rick T wrote: > > As I recall, that doesn't work. > > > > Rick T > > > > Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] wrote: > >> Why not upgrade to IE6 sp1? > >> > >> http://snipurl.com/4bgz > >> > >> Rick T wrote: > >> > >>> Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] wrote: > >>> > >>>> And you keep right on doing exactly what you are doing. > >>>> > >>>> We'll keep an eye on it. Rolling back to IE 5.5 is not an acceptable > >>>> resolution in my book. > >>> > >>> No arguments there, but it's the only one that works. Having Explorer > >>> hang and crash is also not an option. > >>> > >>> Rick T > >>>> > >>>> Rick Chauvin wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> ...understood, but I just had to try. > >>>>> > >>>>> thanks Gary, > >>>>> > >>>>> Rick > >>>>> > >>>>> Gary S. Terhune wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> FWIW, I seriously doubt that Jerry B. is going to read any replies to > >>>>>> his post. It was a notice, nothing more. They've been able to repro > the > >>>>>> issue, which usually means that further user input is probably not > >>>>>> needed. We just have to wait to see what they work out. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> However, I *did* drop your entire post into the same hopper I used > for > >>>>>> the KB891711 issue (the track that finally got some action, or at > least > >>>>>> some public acknowledgement of the problem.) We'll have to wait to > see > >>>>>> what, if anything, comes of it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Gary S. Terhune > >>>>>> MS MVP Shell/User > >>>>>> http://www.grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm > >>>>>> http://www.grystmill.com/articles/security.htm > >>>>>> > >>>>>> "Rick Chauvin" <justask@nospamz.com> wrote in message > >>>>>> news:evown%23kMFHA.2736@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> PA Bear wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> X-Posting to Win95 and WinME NGs eliminated. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Rick, I don't think MS05-002/KB891711 has anything to do with the > >>>>>>>> issue about which you post. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Robert, > >>>>>>> You have totally misunderstood my post. I'm sorry you did. > >>>>>>> Of course we all knowMS05-002/KB891711 has nothing to do with the > >>>>>>> link I gave. http://www.frankprovo.com/win98ie6filesproblem.htm > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> As I said I took this extra opportunity to tag onto Jerry Bryant > MCSE, > >>>>>>> MCDBA post to express to the MS coders about another important > >>>>>>> issue that > >>>>>>> is of great importance for 9x to get fixed - besides what the OP > >>>>>>> is about. > >>>>>>> I apologize for tagging onto it, but felt it was important enough. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> (As you know, my position is that IE6 with SP1 installed has > >>>>>>>> fixed your issue for the vast majority of Win98 users.) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Again here too Robert I have no idea what you are referring to, > >>>>>>> but surely > >>>>>>> you are mistaken here of what we are talking about which has been > >>>>>>> well > >>>>>>> confirmed in this 9x newsgroup a hundred times over the last 2 > years; > >>>>>>> thousands of times elsewhere. The issue that the link > >>>>>>> http://www.frankprovo.com/win98ie6filesproblem.htm speaks about > >>>>>>> was never > >>>>>>> fixed and I can guarantee it's 100% immutable that the problem > >>>>>>> does exist > >>>>>>> for W98x. I would of not stuck my neck out to make my post if it > >>>>>>> wasn't. > >>>>>>> I guess you don't know me. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The problem is old news but for heavens sake Robert earlier just > today > >>>>>>> even your own Extremely capable MVP Chris Quirke (cquirke) is > onboard > >>>>>>> with this issue and actually uses 9x to know. Listen up: > >>>>>>> news:q2ab41l6293lpj8qcvredolsvbril90gro@4ax.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Rick > >
- Next message: glee: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- Previous message: John Corliss: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- In reply to: Bill in Co.: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- Next in thread: Bill in Co.: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- Reply: Bill in Co.: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- Reply: Rick T: "Re: MS05-002 on 9x and ME"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
