Re: Beta anti spyware

From: Philly lawyer (Phillylawyer_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/20/05 

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:51:07 -0800

Please see my last reply to Shenin Stanley, it applies to you as well, not
to mention others who have called me "dumb" or whatever.

and as for using terms that I don't understand, that is how this whole farce
started, when I asked for an explanation of a term I didn't understand. How
and why this then turned into a referndum on whether I am or am not an idiot
who doesn't know how to read, doesn't deserve assistance when needed, and on
my personal character in general, is beyond me.

"Brian Komar (IdentIT Inc)" wrote:

> In article <5257CCB4-AF0A-4C6A-A43D-73362D6D117D@microsoft.com>,
> Phillylawyer@discussions.microsoft.com says...
> > I read and of course if I had
> > known what that meant it would have been evident that it was Beta software,
> > but that is irrelevant to the discussion. The whole point is that Beta is,
> > as you said, a computerindustry term and has a very specific meaning within
> > the industry. However, regardless of how long it may have been used by
> > Microsoft and understood by those in the industry, I am not in the industry
> > and had never seen the term before. As a layperson, I therefore would have
> > no way of knowing what it meant without having it explained to me.
> >
> >
> As others have stated, ignorance when agreeing to contracts is not an
> excuse.
> So to extend things to the ridiculous, as I see you are heading there,
> if you were unaware that a specific offence was punishable by
> incarceration, then you would defend yourself with "I did not know the
> meaning of the term"
>
> I think you are a shill, and do not deserver any more responses. If you
> cannot read and *understand* basic terminilogy, why even come here for
> support, as we may use terms that you are unaware of...
>
> Brian
>

Relevant Pages