Re: Beta anti spyware
From: IdentIT Inc (bkomar_at_nospam.identit.ca)
Date: 02/20/05
- Next message: Philly lawyer: "Re: Beta anti spyware"
- Previous message: Philly lawyer: "Re: Beta anti spyware"
- In reply to: Philly lawyer: "Re: Beta anti spyware"
- Next in thread: Philly lawyer: "Re: Beta anti spyware"
- Reply: Philly lawyer: "Re: Beta anti spyware"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 13:29:22 -0600
In article <5257CCB4-AF0A-4C6A-A43D-73362D6D117D@microsoft.com>,
Phillylawyer@discussions.microsoft.com says...
> I read and of course if I had
> known what that meant it would have been evident that it was Beta software,
> but that is irrelevant to the discussion. The whole point is that Beta is,
> as you said, a computerindustry term and has a very specific meaning within
> the industry. However, regardless of how long it may have been used by
> Microsoft and understood by those in the industry, I am not in the industry
> and had never seen the term before. As a layperson, I therefore would have
> no way of knowing what it meant without having it explained to me.
>
>
As others have stated, ignorance when agreeing to contracts is not an
excuse.
So to extend things to the ridiculous, as I see you are heading there,
if you were unaware that a specific offence was punishable by
incarceration, then you would defend yourself with "I did not know the
meaning of the term"
I think you are a shill, and do not deserver any more responses. If you
cannot read and *understand* basic terminilogy, why even come here for
support, as we may use terms that you are unaware of...
Brian
- Next message: Philly lawyer: "Re: Beta anti spyware"
- Previous message: Philly lawyer: "Re: Beta anti spyware"
- In reply to: Philly lawyer: "Re: Beta anti spyware"
- Next in thread: Philly lawyer: "Re: Beta anti spyware"
- Reply: Philly lawyer: "Re: Beta anti spyware"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|