Re: avoid NTFS or ...
From: Joe Richards [MVP] (humorexpress_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/13/04
- Next message: hfs2_at_yahoo.com: "hijack browser 69.20..."
- Previous message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: Best Practice for User Accounts"
- In reply to: {_~_~_~__at_ocean.net: "avoid NTFS or ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:46:58 -0500
HAHAHA!
This explains why some techs make less than others. :o)
FAT is dead, it sucks. People should have stopped using it ages ago. I haven't
had a FAT partition on anything since about 1996 when I started using NT4.
joe
--
Joe Richards Microsoft MVP Windows Server Directory Services
www.joeware.net
Fishy wrote:
> I've been reading -- seems some techs prefer FAT instead of NTFS for
> security reasons. Could somebody please elaborate? All the MS hype I
> read touted NTFS as the best thing since sliced bread.
>
> I've got both, and frankly don't notice anything better about one than
> the other.
>
> <*((((><{
> Fishy@Ocean.Net
>
>
- Next message: hfs2_at_yahoo.com: "hijack browser 69.20..."
- Previous message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: Best Practice for User Accounts"
- In reply to: {_~_~_~__at_ocean.net: "avoid NTFS or ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]