Re: SPAM from "myself" to myself
From: Alun Jones [MSFT] (alunj_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 11/05/04
- Next message: Shenan Stanley: "Re: Give user acces to regkeys"
- Previous message: Si: "Hotmail and Comcast - rejections?"
- In reply to: Lionel Fourquaux: "Re: SPAM from "myself" to myself"
- Next in thread: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: SPAM from "myself" to myself"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:20:19 -0800
"Lionel Fourquaux" <use-reply-to@no-spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:%23rODSl2wEHA.1512@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> "Alun Jones [MSFT]" <alunj@online.microsoft.com> a écrit dans le message
> de news: efKVwuowEHA.2908@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> My favourite analogy is to note that the "From" header is as reliable as
>> the "From" address on a physical envelope in postal mail.
>
> Yes, it's a good analogy. When compared to postal mail, I find it rather
> interesting to see how widespread false From addresses have become.
Consider the number of postal mail fraud laws, and the corresponding absence
of any such laws for email...
[Note: I am not a lawyer, your laws may be different to my laws, and even my
laws may be different from what I imagine they ought to be]
Alun.
~~~~
- Next message: Shenan Stanley: "Re: Give user acces to regkeys"
- Previous message: Si: "Hotmail and Comcast - rejections?"
- In reply to: Lionel Fourquaux: "Re: SPAM from "myself" to myself"
- Next in thread: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: SPAM from "myself" to myself"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
