Re: Prevent dll replacing
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:50:21 +0200
Miha Pihler wrote:
>>And If I use late binding instancing, how can I verify the digital
>>signature of the module?
> I am not a developer so I can't help you here. I guess this would be better
> asked in developer NewsGroup.
> If I had to develop this, I guess what I would do is create another program
> whose sole task would be to check the DLL signature. If the signature was
> not what it is supposed to be, it would "kill" the program...
> Now if this is stupid suggestion -- I guess this is the reason why I am not
> the developer :-)
Don't worry ;-)
- Re: Signatures (was Re: typewriter function for an impact printer?)
... but it's not had trouble before. ... I'd raise it with the developer, ... I tell mutt to verify your signature. ... proper signature separator because the trailing space remains missing. ...
- Re: Prevent dll replacing
... > And If I use late binding instancing, how can I verify the digital ... I am not a developer so I can't help you here. ... whose sole task would be to check the DLL signature. ...
- Re: Centralized Database of MD5Signatures
... Like a large database of valid MD5 signatures ... PGP signatures are a better way to go. ... - The key does not have to be stored with the signature. ... If I download a tool from developer A, ...
- Re: [kde-linux] Cryptography in KDE 3.58/Kubuntu 7.10
... Message was signed on 24/01/2008 23:28 with unknown key ... The validity of the signature cannot be verified. ... Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer ... KDE user support, developer mentoring ...
- Re: how can we restrict what certificate WSE will use?
... > X509SecurityTokenManager to verify the request is from a trusted client. ... > certificate to build a valid signature and encrypted data section. ...