Re: Windows 2003 Server security vs Red hat Linux
From: Phillip Windell (_at_.)
Date: 09/30/04
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: ZoneAlarm is your friend"
- Previous message: Paul Adare - MVP - Microsoft Virtual PC: "Re: DSO Exploit"
- Maybe in reply to: Jeff Cochran: "Re: Windows 2003 Server security vs Red hat Linux"
- Next in thread: Todd: "Re: Windows 2003 Server security vs Red hat Linux"
- Reply: Todd: "Re: Windows 2003 Server security vs Red hat Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:37:45 -0500
"Steve" <56steve19_at_hotmail_dot_com> wrote in message
news:ORBcKtmpEHA.3592@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> And you're professing your faith as a "Microsoft guy"?
I'm just a "realist". I've been in that "MS vs Linux" enough to know what
to expect from people. It is like aurguing Ford vs Chevy in an auto parts
store.
But if I was to profess any faith...I guess it would be MS. They've done a
lot for me personally by their own choice and I don't even work for them.
> Steve, a "platform neutral guy"
We use Ms, Linux, Solaris, IRIX, and Macs at our facility. There are days
when they all stink,...or I stink,...or sometimes it is just a full moon.
-- Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] www.wandtv.com
- Next message: Phillip Windell: "Re: ZoneAlarm is your friend"
- Previous message: Paul Adare - MVP - Microsoft Virtual PC: "Re: DSO Exploit"
- Maybe in reply to: Jeff Cochran: "Re: Windows 2003 Server security vs Red hat Linux"
- Next in thread: Todd: "Re: Windows 2003 Server security vs Red hat Linux"
- Reply: Todd: "Re: Windows 2003 Server security vs Red hat Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
