Re: XP SP2 with firewall actived and run symantec security check tools...

From: Stephen Cartwright [MSFT] (scart_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 09/20/04


Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:01:28 -0700

It sounds like you have File and Print sharing exception enabled at least
for ports 139 and 445, this would also account why ICMP echo request is
being seen.. If you do not need to share this out then you can disable the
exception as this does expose your machine as reported by the symantec port
scan

-- 
Stephen Cartwright [MSFT]
"This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no 
 rights."
"José Joye" <jose.joye@KILLTHESPAMSbluewin.ch> wrote in message 
news:edecnVtnEHA.3876@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Thanks!
> José
> "PA Bear" <PABear@mvps.org> wrote in message 
> news:e1lp02PnEHA.3196@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> The WinXP firewall is a one-way (incoming) firewall.
>>
>> For more help, see...
>>
>>   Troubleshooting Your Installation of SP2
>>   http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;[ln];xpsp2insttshoot
>>
>> Changes to Functionality in Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2
>>   Network Protection
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/sp2netwk.mspx
>>
>> Troubleshooting Windows Firewall settings in Windows XP Service Pack 2
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=875357
>> -- 
>> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>> MS MVP-Windows (IE/OE), AH-VSOP
>>
>> Are You Ready for WinXP SP2?
>> http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/protect/default.aspx
>>
>> WinXP SP2 Release Notes
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;835935
>>
>> AumHa Forums
>> http://forum.aumha.org
>>
>> José Joye wrote:
>>> First, sorry if this has already been asked before. I goooooooogled to 
>>> find
>>> it but did not get a clear evidence   ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>> I installed the SP2 and activated the firewall.
>>> Then I went to Symantec and run their security checker
>>> http://security.symantec.com/default.asp?productid=symhome&langid=ie&venid=sym
>>>
>>> It tells me that it is open to acker exposures:
>>>
>>> - ICMP ping                                --> Open   (In the advanced 
>>> tab,
>>> of my firewall for ICMP, this is not allowed???)
>>> - 135 Location Service (loc-srv)  --> Open
>>> - 139 NetBios                             --> Closed
>>> - 445 WindowNT/2000 SMB     --> Open
>>>
>>>
>>> I tried to look at the docs (...not sure where to find a good one) to 
>>> see if
>>> I can close/hidde these ports --> but did not find any...
>>>
>>>
>>> Could someone tell me if it is possible to close these ports and how to
>>> amend the setting so as to be as safe as possible with the integrated
>>> firewall.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> José
>>
>
> 


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Trouble accessing Outlook Web Access from behind firewall
    ... When starting the firewall I also set ... > rejected and dropped packets are logged, however I see nothing in my log ... > # Higher ports needed to accept incoming/outgoing calls ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: iptables configuration
    ... >> that if a 'virus/trojan' initiated a connection to the net, the firewall ... >> would not protect the LAN. ... The LAN is NATed with private IPs to one public IP. ... the ports that are used by services running on linux. ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Norton Personal Firewall 2003
    ... |> First thing I would do is put the GRC test site into the Exclusions ... | ports they will not get the same result being in my blocklist, ... the firewall checks unsolicited inbound communications attempts. ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: How to stealth against ping/echo requests?
    ... I just started using the Online-Armor firewall. ... Some ports are even open. ... Are you behind a router? ... Every time it founds a new LAN, it asks if you want to trust it ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: What is broken:McAfeee firewall or my router ????? Urgent, ple
    ... your computer regardless of what McAfee firewall said. ... If your router is ... warned about those ports being available right away if you had any of those ...
    (microsoft.public.security)

Quantcast