Re: assigning ip addresses on a secure way
From: Steven L Umbach (n9rou_at_n0-spam-for-me-comcast.net)
Date: 08/20/04
- Next message: Mike Chan [MSFT]: "Re: MBSA 1.2.1 launched today"
- Previous message: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: Deleting an Email"
- In reply to: eric romero: "Re: assigning ip addresses on a secure way"
- Next in thread: eric romero: "Re: assigning ip addresses on a secure way"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:55:10 GMT
As Phillip mentioned that will not work. --- Steve
"eric romero" <e.romero@cgnet.com> wrote in message
news:Op8049ihEHA.632@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> thank you for the information, probably the answer is no but I still want to
> ask, DHCP superscopes looks to me that I can create 2 scopes 192.168. and
> 10.3.15 so the dhcp will assign these ips, is it possible under the
> superscope scenario to configure the DHCP to assign 10.3.ip s just to the
> office computers and 192.168 to a visitor?
>
> thx
> "Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@n0-spam-for-me-comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:lSTUc.281905$%_6.28000@attbi_s01...
>> DHCP works off of broadcasts. In a normal network configuration, any
> computer that
>> has network access to a DHCP server can get an address as long as there
> are address
>> leases available that are not reserved. DHCP reservations can take a lot
> of time to
>> configure on a larger network and there are reports of users saying that
> unused
>> reservations have been leased to DHCP clients booting on the network when
> there are
>> no addresses left in the lease pool.
>>
>> One way to manage what you want is to use a managed switch with security
> features.
>> These type of switches are reasonably priced these days. For instance the
> HP Procurve
>> 2524 goes for $400 or less on Ebay with a lifetime warranty and with
> current firmware
>> offers port isolation, mac filtering, vlans, and 802.1X authentication.
> That switch
>> allows you to filter mac addresses in a learn mode that can lock ports to
> the current
>> mac address without any manual configuration of address tables. It can
> also bock a
>> port where an intrusion is detected and issue an alert. Note that mac
> address
>> security is not 100 percent secure but is still a good measure to block
> access from
>> all but malicious users which should be dealt with severely. 802.1X is
> much better
>> but involves more infrastructure and compatible operating systems. Port
> isolation
>> allows ports on the switch to only access other assigned ports in a
> variety of
>> configurations and can allow all computers internet access while not
> allowing access
>> to other restricted ports on the switch.
>>
>> http://www.hp.com/rnd/products/switches/switch2524-2512/overview.htm
>>
>> Using DHCP as a security measure is of little value in that it is easy to
> find the
>> network IP address of a lan and manually configure tcp/ip info to gain
> access.
>> Another option is ipsec policies. Only W2K, XP Pro, and Windows 2003 are
> ipsec aware.
>> Within a domain ipsec by default will use kerberos authentication and any
> computer
>> that is not a domain member will not be authenticated for ipsec. Any
> computer that
>> has an ipsec require policy will refuse connection attempts from computers
> that can
>> not use ipsec or comply with the ipsec policy. However domain controllers
> can not
>> engage in ipsec ESP/AH communications with domain members and need to be
> exempt from
>> such ipsec policies by their static IP addresses. --- Steve
>>
>>
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/planning/security/ipsecsteps.asp
> --
>> ipsec procedures.
>>
>>
>> "eric romero" <e.romero@cgnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23b9xPnWhEHA.2908@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I have a Microsoft domain running Microsoft DHCP, I want to know what is
> the
>> > best way to assign ips securely.
>> > i.e if a vendor comes to the office I do not want his/her latop to
> obtain an
>> > ip, ips must be assigned just to office's computers.
>> >
>> > thx
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
- Next message: Mike Chan [MSFT]: "Re: MBSA 1.2.1 launched today"
- Previous message: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: Deleting an Email"
- In reply to: eric romero: "Re: assigning ip addresses on a secure way"
- Next in thread: eric romero: "Re: assigning ip addresses on a secure way"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|