Re: assigning ip addresses on a secure way
From: eric romero (e.romero_at_cgnet.com)
Date: 08/19/04
- Next message: Penny: "my IE has been hijacked!!!"
- Previous message: Lost: "skybot"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: assigning ip addresses on a secure way"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: assigning ip addresses on a secure way"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: assigning ip addresses on a secure way"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:59:48 -0700
thank you for the information, probably the answer is no but I still want to
ask, DHCP superscopes looks to me that I can create 2 scopes 192.168. and
10.3.15 so the dhcp will assign these ips, is it possible under the
superscope scenario to configure the DHCP to assign 10.3.ip s just to the
office computers and 192.168 to a visitor?
thx
"Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@n0-spam-for-me-comcast.net> wrote in message
news:lSTUc.281905$%_6.28000@attbi_s01...
> DHCP works off of broadcasts. In a normal network configuration, any
computer that
> has network access to a DHCP server can get an address as long as there
are address
> leases available that are not reserved. DHCP reservations can take a lot
of time to
> configure on a larger network and there are reports of users saying that
unused
> reservations have been leased to DHCP clients booting on the network when
there are
> no addresses left in the lease pool.
>
> One way to manage what you want is to use a managed switch with security
features.
> These type of switches are reasonably priced these days. For instance the
HP Procurve
> 2524 goes for $400 or less on Ebay with a lifetime warranty and with
current firmware
> offers port isolation, mac filtering, vlans, and 802.1X authentication.
That switch
> allows you to filter mac addresses in a learn mode that can lock ports to
the current
> mac address without any manual configuration of address tables. It can
also bock a
> port where an intrusion is detected and issue an alert. Note that mac
address
> security is not 100 percent secure but is still a good measure to block
access from
> all but malicious users which should be dealt with severely. 802.1X is
much better
> but involves more infrastructure and compatible operating systems. Port
isolation
> allows ports on the switch to only access other assigned ports in a
variety of
> configurations and can allow all computers internet access while not
allowing access
> to other restricted ports on the switch.
>
> http://www.hp.com/rnd/products/switches/switch2524-2512/overview.htm
>
> Using DHCP as a security measure is of little value in that it is easy to
find the
> network IP address of a lan and manually configure tcp/ip info to gain
access.
> Another option is ipsec policies. Only W2K, XP Pro, and Windows 2003 are
ipsec aware.
> Within a domain ipsec by default will use kerberos authentication and any
computer
> that is not a domain member will not be authenticated for ipsec. Any
computer that
> has an ipsec require policy will refuse connection attempts from computers
that can
> not use ipsec or comply with the ipsec policy. However domain controllers
can not
> engage in ipsec ESP/AH communications with domain members and need to be
exempt from
> such ipsec policies by their static IP addresses. --- Steve
>
>
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/planning/security/ipsecsteps.asp
-- > ipsec procedures. > > > "eric romero" <e.romero@cgnet.com> wrote in message > news:%23b9xPnWhEHA.2908@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > Hi all, > > > > I have a Microsoft domain running Microsoft DHCP, I want to know what is the > > best way to assign ips securely. > > i.e if a vendor comes to the office I do not want his/her latop to obtain an > > ip, ips must be assigned just to office's computers. > > > > thx > > > > > >
- Next message: Penny: "my IE has been hijacked!!!"
- Previous message: Lost: "skybot"
- In reply to: Steven L Umbach: "Re: assigning ip addresses on a secure way"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: assigning ip addresses on a secure way"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: assigning ip addresses on a secure way"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|