Re: This proves something for free is not a good thing
From: Paul Adare - MVP - Microsoft Virtual PC (padare_at_newsguy.com)
Date: 04/10/04
- Next message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: How can you be sure?"
- Previous message: Jeff Cochran: "Re: Dictionary for passwords"
- In reply to: sgopus: "Re: This proves something for free is not a good thing"
- Next in thread: sgopus: "Re: This proves something for free is not a good thing"
- Reply:(deleted message) sgopus: "Re: This proves something for free is not a good thing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:15:58 -0700
In article <1528901c41cdb$3dd102e0$a001280a@phx.gbl>, in the
microsoft.public.security news group, sgopus
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> says...
> Of course they can, question is (Should they)?
> Sitting back in calm acceptance allows the system to take
> over your privacy, stand up and howl....public opinion
> does make a difference.
>
If I make a conscious decision to use the Google email service, knowing
what I know about it, how do you make the huge leap that they are
"invading my privacy"?
-- Paul Adare Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo. H. G. Wells, The Wife of Sir Isaac Harman This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
- Next message: Roger Abell [MVP]: "Re: How can you be sure?"
- Previous message: Jeff Cochran: "Re: Dictionary for passwords"
- In reply to: sgopus: "Re: This proves something for free is not a good thing"
- Next in thread: sgopus: "Re: This proves something for free is not a good thing"
- Reply:(deleted message) sgopus: "Re: This proves something for free is not a good thing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]