Re: To clarify the link for CWShredder Update
From: George \(Bindar Dundat\) (JustMe_at_nothome.net)
Date: 02/28/04
- Next message: lucy depalpa: "Security update 823559"
- Previous message: Gary S. Terhune: "Re: To clarify the link for CWShredder Update"
- In reply to: Gary S. Terhune: "Re: To clarify the link for CWShredder Update"
- Next in thread: Gary S. Terhune: "Re: To clarify the link for CWShredder Update"
- Reply: Gary S. Terhune: "Re: To clarify the link for CWShredder Update"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:30:34 -0800
Are you looking at the file date itself or using the info pane?
-- George (Bindar Dundat ©) MS-MVP For Windows Troubleshooting Tips see; http://aumha.org/win4/a/tshoot.htm "Gary S. Terhune" <grystnews@mvps.org> wrote in message news:%23UGJwBZ$DHA.2636@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... | I have it scheduled for 6 am daily. Last HOSTS update was 2/24, mine has | 2/25 date, but the time on it is 10:49 PM--which is when I manually updated | to make sure I had a fresh one before passing it on to my daughter. Because | I add back in Custom URLs, that would make my timestamp sync to whenever I | run update. | | I don't know if your app checks timestamp and only updates if newer is | available (which might get strange if newer comes out but I then add custom | URL before update kicks in--timestamp would be later on my file than that of | MVPS...), or if it just replaces file regardless. If the former, then it | would appear to be working properly--if the latter, then something's wrong. | Best I can do is make sure I check every morning until a new one appears, | and keepa my hands off until then. | | -- | Gary S. Terhune | MS MVP for Windows 9x | | George (Bindar Dundat) wrote: | > Well, I do have a VPC that I could try it on. I haven't even tried | > connecting that to the net. I do know that if the entire file gets | > hijacked that HFM will catch it. but in those cases the whole file is | > being over-written and the check number that is in there goes missing | > so it's easy to detect. Then you get a warning that the file has | > been tampered with and a message box to start a restore from backup | > or a fresh download. Which reminds me I have to ask GST how that | > command line is working out since I haven't been using it. I think | > what I might do is add a line count function to the app somehow so if | > anything gets added or deleted (it shouldn't, but.....) it would get | > picked up by HFM. Right now the System/Hidden/Read Only attributes | > are set so the file is locked but if Spybot can get around that then | > something else could too. | > | > | > "PA Bear" <PABear@mvps.org> wrote in message | > news:OItiHMY$DHA.2800@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... | >> TonyKlein, our Spyware God, just wrote: | >> | >>> There are a couple of CWS variants that hack the Hosts file | >> | >> e.g., I suspect, CWS.SmartKiller. | >> | >> Suggestion: Intionally infect your | >> machine-running-HOSTS-File-Manager with CWS.SmartKiller 'n see what | >> pans out. -- | >> ~PA Bear | >> | >> George (Bindar Dundat) wrote: | >>> Spybot got them. I just had the same report from Mike Burgess. | >>> See if you were using my HOSTS file manager there would be a backup | >>> there and you could just restore. That'll teach ya. | >>> | >>> "PA Bear" <PABear@mvps.org> wrote in message | >>> news:OcbIH5Q$DHA.2432@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... | >>>> Not only are those two HOSTS file entries not working now but | >>>> something (Spybot? CWS.SmartKiller?) had removed them from my list! |
- Next message: lucy depalpa: "Security update 823559"
- Previous message: Gary S. Terhune: "Re: To clarify the link for CWShredder Update"
- In reply to: Gary S. Terhune: "Re: To clarify the link for CWShredder Update"
- Next in thread: Gary S. Terhune: "Re: To clarify the link for CWShredder Update"
- Reply: Gary S. Terhune: "Re: To clarify the link for CWShredder Update"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|