Re: Map a port to a process
From: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp (levinson_k_at_despammed.com)
Date: 12/24/03
- Previous message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: MS leaves much to be desired."
- In reply to: mailpete405: "Map a port to a process"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:26:36 -0500
"mailpete405" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F61E8A5B-3FF2-4252-9065-18331E8F1621@microsoft.com...
> I wish they would stop adding pretty junk to the OS long enough to
incorporate some decent basic security tools as part of the OS. How about a
tool for Windows 2000/XP which will break down the security logs into some
useful information without a big production and use of third party software?
Microsoft is getting better about this. But don't hold your breath.
Getting good security will always require third party tools, because there
will always be a third party tool that does security in a way that's more to
your individual needs. And that's true whether you're talking Microsoft,
*nix or whatever. Microsoft can't bundle five different free firewalls and
three different free sniffers from third party vendors with its OS, like
*nix can, and still offer tech support that is affordable for all those
configurations... nor would you want them to do so, because then doing tech
support at your company would be a headache with all the different software
variations.
- Previous message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: MS leaves much to be desired."
- In reply to: mailpete405: "Map a port to a process"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
