Re: Controlling server security -- to domain or not to domain?
From: Daniel Billingsley (dbillingsley_at_NO.durcon.SPAAMM.com)
Date: 12/11/03
- Next message: Running_in_Circles: "unwanted and unsolicitied "news" of MSN products"
- Previous message: xp slave: "Re: unwanted and unsolicitied "news" of MSN products"
- In reply to: Charles Otstot: "Re: Controlling server security -- to domain or not to domain?"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Controlling server security -- to domain or not to domain?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:47:11 -0500
Everything you say is true, but that was not the scenario the OP presented.
"Charles Otstot" <saries@notmyreal.address.com> wrote in message
news:Oj%23A7JAwDHA.3416@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
<snip>
>
> Hope this clarifies my statements a little better.
>
> Charlie
>
>
- Next message: Running_in_Circles: "unwanted and unsolicitied "news" of MSN products"
- Previous message: xp slave: "Re: unwanted and unsolicitied "news" of MSN products"
- In reply to: Charles Otstot: "Re: Controlling server security -- to domain or not to domain?"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Controlling server security -- to domain or not to domain?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|